🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive action to prohibit social networking access for young people below 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are observing closely to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a increasing chorus of nations are considering parallel restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the leader stating that smartphones and apps are "taking away our youngsters' childhood". The policy may be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is set to enforce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to protect young people from the "influence of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to authenticate the identity and age of social media participants. Authorities have stated that an Australia-style ban remains "an tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has called on lawmakers to enact a bill increasing the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a similar step, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has advised families to restrict their children from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has adopted a symbolic statement calling for a ban for minors unless parental consent is provided. Although it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these services, the step does not create mandatory rules.

"A strong age restriction is a solid first step," said one European lawmaker behind the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Stance

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has not ruled out a possible ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Previously, support gathered behind a legislative effort to introduce limits on social media use by minors, but it was in the end modified. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have expressed concerns. An organization founded by the loved ones of a girl who took her own life after being exposed to disturbing social media material argues that a strict age ban could fail to protect children and could result in a "cliff edge" of exposure when teens turn 16.

"This ban is a response to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are appropriate and age appropriate for minors," commented a influential child protection advocate.

America: A Fragmented Approach

In the United States, action is largely occurring at the regional level against a backdrop of country-wide inaction.

• Utah requires adult approval for minors to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has signed a law banning children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it faces court battles.
• The state of Virginia has approved a regulation capping teenagers to one hour of social media time per day, with any further use dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced measures requiring parental consent for minors to create social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from certain figures to mimic the Australian example, a federal ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Global Views

Outside of the West, additional states are also considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international bodies adopt a more measured stance. A major UN agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "may even have unintended consequences". The body points out that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that government action should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to invest in safety.

While this international debate continues, the policies of the Australian government and its followers demonstrate that states internationally are no longer content to wait for platforms to act voluntarily.