🔗 Share this article

A Danish man has been convicted of uploading nude scenes from protected films and TV series on the social media platform Reddit.

Based on a law enforcement document reviewed by media outlets, the unnamed individual posted 347 clips of nude content in a Reddit group he managed, which were then watched 4.2 million-plus times.

The country's authorities state he has been handed a 7-month suspended jail term for copyright infringement.

Experts explain the man was prosecuted under a seldom-invoked clause in Denmark's copyright law, with the court ruling that by taking the footage out of their original context, the accused had harmed the performers' "ethical entitlements".

He has additionally been convicted of distributing more than 25 terabytes of protected data.

From March 2022 to mid-2023, the user known as "the pseudonym KlammereFyr" on Reddit uploaded sexually explicit scenes featuring over 100 actresses.

He distributed them in the forum he was a moderator of.

Per the Denmark's anti-piracy organization the Rights Alliance, his subreddit had more than 6,000 subscribers and participants were encouraged to request clips of specific performers.

In 2023, advocates filed the case to the authorities on behalf of the impacted artists, directors and production companies, which led to the forum being shut down.

One actress, among the performers whose explicit content were shared in the community, explained to Danish media at the time she felt there was a difference between being seen naked in a film and being shown on Reddit.

The performer stated the posts amounted to "exploitation".

'A significant message'

The defendant was detained in September 2024 and pleaded culpable to the allegations last month.

In a statement after the verdict, the head of the Rights Alliance the organization's leader said the decision sent an "significant" message "that infringements of artists' entitlements have consequences".

The verdict is viewed as unique in the country for its use of the "moral rights" clause of the national copyright law, which specifies an creator's creation cannot be used in a way which infringes upon their reputation.

Copyright law expert a legal scholar informed the media the case was "rare" for its emphasis on the damage to the dignity of an performer, rather than to them financially.

The extent to which the ruling could affect nations abroad is uncertain.

But she said there may be "more and more of such cases" in the coming years with the growth of artificial intelligence, where "the sanctity of an individual's work might be tempered with with greater ease".